Skip to Content
Everything Else

Even The Tulsa World is digging up dirt on Scott Pruitt…

11:14 AM EST on December 16, 2014

pruitt alito

The Oklahoman editorial writers may want to start brainstorming for another defense of Scott Pruitt.

Earlier today, the Tulsa World took a deeper look into the New York Times expose about Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, and in particular, how he raised nearly $300,000 in campaign funds this year despite not having an opponent in the 2014 election. The paper also examined the more than cozy relationship Pruitt has with Devon Energy and their chairman Larry Nichols.

Via The World:

Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s re-election campaign has raised more than $300,000 — and spent almost $160,000 — since he learned in mid-April that he would not have an opponent this election cycle.

Oklahoma Ethics Commission records show Pruitt not only continued to receive campaign contributions but actively raised funds through the Nov. 4 general election, even though he had no opponent and cannot seek re-election in 2018.

While it is not unusual for term-limited officials with no opponents to continue fundraising, the extent of Pruitt’s activity is. By comparison, state Treasurer Ken Miller, who was also re-elected without opposition and is term-limited in 2018, has raised less than $2,000 since the filing period for this year’s elections ended on April 11.

Pruitt did not respond to questions about his campaign’s activities.

Want to know the difference between bad journalism and good journalism? Just look at the two different ways our state's largest newspapers responded to the New York Times report. The Oklahoman (a.k.a. "The state's most trusted news") immediately put Pruitt's dick in their mouth and tried to brush off the Times expose as an example of biased, hypocritical Yankee journalism. The Tulsa World, on the other hand, followed the eye-opening news of a secret alliance between our state's attorney general and for-profit energy companies with an even deeper look into Scott Pruitt's fundraising activities. It's like one is a biased rag bravely serving and defending the money rich establishment and the other is a legitimate newspaper trying to inform its readers with news and information. Can you guess which is which?